Skip to content
60

diabetic supplies

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 56Growth 13Conversion 27Competition 87Returns 97Price range 87Avg price 91Brand share 95Review moat 23Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Incredible36%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$21.46

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$5.64–$94.72

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$403K

$403K/yr · 861K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Okay2.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad6,884.84

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-24.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

52 falling

Sellers

206

Top-5 brand share

36%

Open market

59%

  • Bulinlulu11%
  • Lingo8%
  • TRUEplus7%
  • Alcedo5%
  • Special Essentials4%
  • suzamed4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$12K6%$24K9%$36K12%$48K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 63 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -24.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall11%

“Good quality container”

Ease Of Use11%

“easy to take”

Value For Money9%

“Decent price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Blood Sugar Level5%

“perfect for diabetics”

Efficiency4%

“Works perfectly”

Health Monitoring4%

“Wonderful Health Tool”

Size-Overall3%

“size fits all”

Accuracy-Overall3%

“Accurate and affordable”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Comfortable and warm”

What buyers complain about

Durability10%

“Broken after 2 days”

Connectivity-Overall8%

“Connectivity Issues”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy8%

“Accuracy is not there”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Did not work”

Value For Money6%

“Kind of expensive”

Accuracy-Overall5%

“NOT ACCURATE”

Size-Overall5%

“It's small”

Quality-Overall5%

“Bad quality”

Blood Sugar Level5%

“Not for diabetics”

Compatibility-Overall3%

“1 said 'incompatible'”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall26%
Functionality-Overall11%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy6%
Blood Sugar Level6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Compatibility-Overall5%
Connectivity-Overall4%
Value For Money3%
Accuracy-Overall3%
Feet Fit2%