Skip to content
60

creatine protein powder

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 67Growth 25Conversion 61Competition 76Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 12Review moat 23Quality gap 72

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$42.28

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$15.15–$85.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good$671K

$671K/yr · 298K searches

Conversion

Good5.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+0.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad6,803.13

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad95%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

414

Top-5 brand share

95%

Open market

4%

  • BIRDMAN50%
  • Animal32%
  • Ancient Nutrition6%
  • Vega4%
  • Optimum Nutrition2%
  • MuscleTech1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$27K8%$54K12%$81K16%$107K101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 38 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +0.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar, Apr · busiest ÷ quietest = 8.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall14%

“Best Taste”

Quality-Overall14%

“The quality is consistent”

Nutritional Content7%

“Good protein”

Flavor6%

“the orange flavor is good”

Value For Money6%

“Good value for the money”

Solubility6%

“Easy to Mix”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

Energy Level3%

“Great energy”

Blend/Ratio3%

“Mix it well”

Efficiency3%

“Works well”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall18%

“tasted funny”

Solubility9%

“Doesn't mix well”

Flavor7%

“Bad Flavor”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth the price”

Texture/Consistency-Overall4%

“Grainy texture”

Quality-Overall2%

“Bad quality control”

Smell2%

“The smell is awful”

Sweetness2%

“Too much added sugar”

Side Effects2%

“Gave me heartburn”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief2%

“Hurt my stomach sooo bad”

Top return reasons

Value For Money18%
Flavor12%
Functionality-Overall10%
Ingredients-Overall7%
Quality-Overall6%
Product Condition6%
Taste-Overall6%
Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Solubility3%