Skip to content
61

cooling patch

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 39Growth 95Conversion 78Competition 38Returns 97Price range 48Avg price 48Brand share 26Review moat 41Quality gap 78

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Incredible+125.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Great7.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay$11.73

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay$5.27–$23.90

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,371.84

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$200K

$200K/yr · 220K searches

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

61

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

8%

  • EASYEAH46%
  • AllSett Health14%
  • BeKoool13%
  • TCANG11%
  • LotFancy5%
  • HealthWise2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$10K10%$20K15%$30K20%$40K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +125.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use10%

“Comfortable to wear”

Adhesion/Stickiness8%

“The adhesive also works well”

Quality-Overall8%

“Overall, I think this is a well made product”

Value For Money7%

“Affordable”

Efficiency6%

“The cool pads work well”

Size-Overall6%

“fit perfectly wherever you need comfort”

Cold Relief5%

“These cold packs go on feeling cool”

Warmth5%

“These are great to have on hand during those extra hot summer days”

Comfort-Overall4%

“Its comfortable”

Smell3%

“No weird smell”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness18%

“Adhesive is not great at all”

Smell12%

“Strong unpleasant smell also”

Functionality-Overall11%

“Didn't work for me”

Value For Money5%

“Waste of money”

Heating5%

“cannot combat any real heat”

Durability3%

“Doesn't last”

Size-Overall3%

“Small size, average”

Temperature Retention2%

“Too hot”

Quality-Overall2%

“Cheap product”

Warmth2%

“dont stay cold for a long time”

Top return reasons

Adhesion/Stickiness19%
Smell15%
Functionality-Overall14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Size-Overall10%
Fever Relief4%
Heating4%
Value For Money3%
Age Suitability2%
Skin Health1%