Skip to content
54

cold medicine

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but soft demand (-45.0% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 97Growth 3Conversion 63Competition 64Returns 99Price range 66Avg price 55Brand share 43Review moat 25Quality gap 17

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$3.9M

$3.9M/yr · 5.5M searches

Price range

Good$5.31–$34.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good5.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$12.63

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad4,348.12

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-45.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

674

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

17%

  • Amazon Basic Care29%
  • Mucinex21%
  • Tylenol14%
  • Vicks10%
  • Boiron6%
  • Theraflu4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (11 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$118K6%$236K9%$354K12%$472K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 41 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -45.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
250K150KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Cold Relief15%

“Great for colds”

Efficiency12%

“Works perfectly”

Value For Money10%

“Very affordable”

Quality-Overall9%

“Its amazing product nothing complicated”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“as pictured”

Taste-Overall5%

“Amazing taste”

Cough Relief5%

“Good for cough”

Warmth4%

“Keeping Hands Warm”

Sinus Relief2%

“Sinus relief”

Ease Of Use2%

“It has come in handy multiple times”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall11%

“HORRIBLE TASTE”

Functionality-Overall9%

“Not effective”

Value For Money6%

“Very costly”

Size-Overall5%

“They are big”

Smell4%

“actually smells a little bit like urine”

Cough Relief4%

“Coughing”

Warmth3%

“No warmth”

Quality-Overall2%

“Bad quality”

Ease Of Use2%

“hard to get on”

Cold Relief2%

“Had a bad case of the flu”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall67%
Warmth6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Value For Money2%
Smell2%
Thickness2%
Water Resistance2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Material Quality2%
Quality-Overall2%