Skip to content
44

coconut protein shake

Skip it

A small market ($42K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 11Growth 19Conversion 56Competition 30Returns 100Price range 88Avg price 95Brand share 29Review moat 39Quality gap 57

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$33.75

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.13–$73.77

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good4.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Okay2,558.89

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay87%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-11.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$42K

$42K/yr · 27K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

12 rising

Sellers

47

Top-5 brand share

87%

Open market

10%

  • Premier Protein33%
  • ALOHA28%
  • Atkins19%
  • Labrada4%
  • Primal Kitchen3%
  • GNC3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$4K20%$8K30%$13K40%$17K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 55 weeks — -11.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '25Spike '26JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 9.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall37%

“Absolutely delicious”

Flavor21%

“The flavor is rich”

Nutritional Content19%

“Excellent protein powder”

Quality-Overall3%

“Excellent Product”

Value For Money2%

“Reasonably priced”

Sweetness2%

“Very sweet”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“Excellent texture”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Use1%

“ease of use”

Soft Feel1%

“Its smooth creamy”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall21%

“Bland taste”

Flavor18%

“Didn't like the flavor”

Value For Money7%

“Very expensive”

Sweetness6%

“your tolerance for sweetness is very low”

Nutritional Content4%

“NO fiber in this brand/flavor”

Artificial Sweeteners2%

“Ugh horrible stevia taste”

Solubility2%

“Does not mix well”

Thickness2%

“Too Thick”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“a thicker texture”

Quality-Overall1%

“This one wasnt as good as the ones in the boxes”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall49%
Flavor18%
Leak-Proof8%
Ingredients-Overall6%
Nutritional Content4%
Moist/Dry3%
Value For Money3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Scratch Resistance3%
Smell2%