Skip to content
46

coconut oil suppositories

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 42Growth 13Conversion 90Competition 21Returns 99Price range 68Avg price 89Brand share 0Review moat 29Quality gap 63

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$20.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$9.71–$26.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$216K

$216K/yr · 98K searches

Review moat

Okay3,581.45

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad75%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-24.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 75% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 flat

Sellers

9

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Carlson58%
  • Femallay24%
  • NewLife Naturals12%
  • Seeq Wellness6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$32K30%$65K45%$97K60%$130K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 11 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -24.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall14%

“Excellent product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product14%

“Works as advertised”

Moist/Dry13%

“Great moisturizing benefits”

Ease Of Use8%

“Easy to use”

Efficiency5%

“Effective”

Soft Feel5%

“Creamy”

Hormonal Balance3%

“Hormone free, lasting relief, no gross or inconvenient discharge- hydrating, does not impact the flora/ph in an away that I can tell”

Allergies3%

“They didnt disrupt my PH of cause any irritation”

Vitamin3%

“A vitamin for comfort”

Lubrication2%

“Awesome Product works great for lubrication”

What buyers complain about

Moist/Dry22%

“Like a lack of hydration that didnt feel extreme”

Allergies8%

“Cause irritation and bleeding”

Ease Of Use7%

“I couldn't use them”

Ingredients-Overall6%

“These were great until I saw the ingredients which contain hydrogenated oils”

Value For Money6%

“Price high”

Sleep Quality4%

“it burned so badly I couldnt sleep all night”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Didnt work well for me”

Lubrication4%

“Very lubricanted”

Sensitivity-Overall4%

“For sensitive people”

Residue4%

“Did not see a difference also leaves too much residue”

Top return reasons

Smell26%
Functionality-Overall14%
Ingredients-Overall11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Lubrication7%
Product Condition7%
Stain Resistance4%
Oily/Greasy4%
Size-Overall3%
Certifications2%