Skip to content
40

clotrimazole vaginial cream

Skip it

Soft demand (-19.8% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 31Growth 15Conversion 93Competition 22Returns 100Price range 31Avg price 34Brand share 38Review moat 23Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Avg price

Okay$10.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Okay$142K

$142K/yr · 124K searches

Price range

Okay$4.62–$19.58

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad7,711

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-19.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

12 falling

Sellers

69

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

14%

  • Clotrimazole41%
  • TARO16%
  • Clotrimazole vaginal12%
  • Gyne-Lotrimin10%
  • Amazon Basic Care4%
  • Globe3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$14K20%$28K30%$43K40%$57K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -19.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency17%

“It really does work”

Quality-Overall15%

“Excellent product”

Value For Money15%

“Fairly priced”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“As described”

Itch Relief8%

“Great for jock itch”

Allergies5%

“no irritation at all”

Ease Of Application3%

“Application is simple it spreads easily”

Ease Of Use3%

“Its convenient to have on hand for personal care”

Skin Health2%

“Helping my skin issues alot”

Fever Relief1%

“Helped clear a fungal infection I had in my pinky”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall18%

“Didn't work”

Allergies15%

“Allergic reaction”

Smell9%

“Smells like gasoline”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Not as advertised”

Itch Relief4%

“does not relieve itching”

Quality-Overall3%

“or they have poor quality control”

Value For Money3%

“What a waste of money”

Pain Relief-Overall2%

“Athlete's foot got worse”

Dosage2%

“Garage dose not work at all”

Sensitivity-Overall2%

“NOT FOR SENSITIVE SKIN”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product28%
Functionality-Overall22%
Value For Money6%
Leak-Proof6%
Dispensing Mechanism5%
Smell3%
Joint Pain3%
Quality-Overall3%
Size-Overall3%
Product Condition3%