Skip to content
44

chiggerex

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 94% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 21Growth 30Conversion 77Competition 25Returns 100Price range 64Avg price 85Brand share 16Review moat 20Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$19.04

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$4.25–$33.83

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+4.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay70%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad$86K

$86K/yr · 60K searches

Review moat

Bad13,123.25

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 70% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

71

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

5%

  • Salonpas69%
  • HealthWise12%
  • Ebanel6%
  • Globe5%
  • Bactine MAX2%
  • MOHNARK2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 5%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$9K20%$17K30%$26K40%$34K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +4.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 26.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency20%

“very effective for me”

Quality-Overall12%

“Great, RELIABLE product”

Value For Money10%

“Good value for money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“AS ADVERTISED”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Smell4%

“No harsh smell”

Joint Pain3%

“It really worked to numb my knee pain”

Ease Of Application3%

“I applied it in a thin amount”

Absorbency3%

“It absorbs well”

Allergies2%

“with no irritation or breakouts”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall26%

“Not effective”

Pain Relief-Overall10%

“it hurt so bad”

Smell7%

“strong smell”

Value For Money6%

“WASTE OF MONEY”

Durability5%

“wore off really fast”

Ease Of Use4%

“IMPOSSIBLE to open”

Allergies4%

“Allergic reaction”

Sensitivity-Overall3%

“Do not use on sensitive skin”

Size-Overall3%

“The container seems small”

Quality-Overall2%

“As for any numbing quality, there is very little”