Skip to content
50

cheesecake protein powder

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a small market ($68K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 17Growth 17Conversion 60Competition 24Returns 100Price range 93Avg price 95Brand share 49Review moat 61Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$42.42

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$13.72–$61.24

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,059.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad71%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$68K

$68K/yr · 31K searches

Growth

Bad-16.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 71% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

20

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

18%

  • RYSE Up Supplements34%
  • PEScience16%
  • NutraBio11%
  • Maxler8%
  • FlavCity7%
  • LEGION6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$7K20%$14K30%$20K40%$27K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -16.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
3K2KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall32%

“AMAZING TASTE”

Nutritional Content20%

“Really good protein”

Flavor19%

“A great selection of flavors”

Blend/Ratio5%

“Tastes good and blends easy enough”

Quality-Overall4%

“Overall, its high quality, easy to mix, and a great addition to my daily routine”

Ingredients-Overall2%

“Clean ingredients”

Solubility2%

“it mixes well”

Value For Money2%

“great price”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“smooth texture”

Ease Of Cleaning1%

“Clean Simple Eats”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall27%

“Bland taste”

Flavor13%

“It seems that they changed the formula and the flavor is so strong and artificial now”

Nutritional Content7%

“Not the best protein shake”

Value For Money6%

“Too expensive”

Sweetness4%

“Horribly sweet”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“The texture is very grainy”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief2%

“Upsets stomach”

Smell2%

“Now has an artificial smell”

Quality-Overall2%

“Garbage”

Artificial Sweeteners2%

“It's so disgustingly sweet with the nastiest chemically artificial sweetener after taste”