Skip to content
54

charcoal binder

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but soft demand (-5.7% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 22Conversion 96Competition 24Returns 100Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 50Review moat 41Quality gap 35

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Incredible$25.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.61–$76.21

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$372K

$372K/yr · 113K searches

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,364.65

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-5.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

16 flat

Sellers

35

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

21%

  • Resciency23%
  • Vital+Boon20%
  • NOW Foods11%
  • MARYRUTH'S11%
  • NaturaLife Labs10%
  • Bio-Botanical Research5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$19K10%$37K15%$56K20%$74K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 58 weeks — -5.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KPrime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Mar, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall19%

“Great quality at affordable prices”

Detoxification8%

“Great detox aid”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief8%

“Great for stomach issues”

Efficiency7%

“Effective”

Regulates Digestion6%

“Works great and hasn't caused any constipation”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Just as advertised”

Value For Money5%

“Good deal”

Ease Of Use4%

“Convenient”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing3%

“The capsules are easy to take”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“impressive ingredients”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall10%

“Saw no results. No changes”

Smell8%

“Funky smell and taste”

Side Effects7%

“The nausea was paralyzing”

Regulates Digestion6%

“Constipation”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief5%

“my stomach hurts”

Dosage5%

“There were more pills in the container than there should have been. which is kind of scary”

Quality-Overall4%

“maybe poor quality control”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“It has ingredients I'm not comfortable with”

Taste-Overall3%

“Its tasteless,”

Value For Money3%

“very expensive”

Top return reasons

Strength29%
Compatibility-Overall14%
Age Suitability14%
Ingredients-Overall14%
Leak-Proof14%
Soft Feel14%