Skip to content
57

cbs gummies extra strength pain relief made in usa

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 9Growth 19Conversion 29Competition 83Returns 100Price range 88Avg price 95Brand share 87Review moat 25Quality gap 86

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$26.05

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.58–$88.70

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Conversion

Okay2.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad4,315.65

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-12.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$35K

$35K/yr · 58K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

38 falling

Sellers

59

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

47%

  • Arvesa18%
  • Premium Hemp Extract Daily9%
  • 5kind clinical skincare9%
  • MOSRAY7%
  • LUCKCHAN6%
  • Oshianic4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$1K6%$2K9%$3K12%$4K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 55 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -12.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KBlack Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency16%

“Works quickly”

Quality-Overall13%

“Great Quality & Extra Strength Works”

Joint Pain10%

“It really helps with joint pain”

Smell7%

“Pleasant smell”

Pain Relief-Overall6%

“Good pain relieving cream”

Taste-Overall5%

“Tastes so good, like candy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Better than expected”

Value For Money5%

“Good Value”

Sleep Quality4%

“it help me to sleep”

Muscle Pain Relief2%

“Really helps sore muscles”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall22%

“Poor Performance”

Pain Relief-Overall14%

“No relief”

Value For Money8%

“too expensive”

Smell8%

“Strong Scent”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“False advertisement”

Joint Pain3%

“I really have joint pain in my”

Quality-Overall2%

“Poor Quality Control”

Sleep Quality2%

“Poor Sleep Quality”

Strength2%

“Weak”

Allergies2%

“Allergic to this product”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall34%
Smell16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product15%
Joint Pain7%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Leak-Proof3%
Pain Relief-Overall3%
Product Condition2%
Value For Money2%
Skin Health2%