Skip to content
55

cbdmd

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a small market ($74K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 18Growth 26Conversion 25Competition 70Returns 99Price range 88Avg price 95Brand share 66Review moat 24Quality gap 83

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$25.29

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.58–$88.70

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Okay+0.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad2.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad5,630.31

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$74K

$74K/yr · 148K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

22 falling

Sellers

40

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

30%

  • Arvesa29%
  • 5kind clinical skincare12%
  • Premium Hemp Extract Daily8%
  • Hempvana8%
  • Medical Miracles7%
  • WACHRAY5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$4K10%$7K15%$11K20%$15K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 36 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +0.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KHoliday '24Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency19%

“Works Well”

Quality-Overall14%

“Excellent product that exceeded my expectations”

Joint Pain10%

“This truy does help with joint pain”

Pain Relief-Overall9%

“Good pain relieving cream”

Smell9%

“Pleasant smell”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As advertised”

Value For Money5%

“reasonably priced”

Muscle Pain Relief3%

“Really helps sore muscles”

Sleep Quality2%

“gives good sleep quality”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall25%

“Poor Performance”

Pain Relief-Overall17%

“No Pain Relief”

Smell9%

“Strong Scent”

Value For Money8%

“price is a little high”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“False advertisement”

Joint Pain3%

“Didn't relieve any joint pain we used it on, most disappointing”

Quality-Overall3%

“Poor Quality Control”

Allergies2%

“Allergic to this product”

Durability2%

“doesnt last”

Sleep Quality1%

“Did not work to help sleep”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall35%
Advertised Vs Actual Product15%
Smell15%
Joint Pain8%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Leak-Proof3%
Pain Relief-Overall3%
Product Condition2%
Value For Money2%
Skin Health2%