Skip to content
62

cbd roll on

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 28Growth 39Conversion 46Competition 61Returns 99Price range 93Avg price 95Brand share 81Review moat 81Quality gap 67

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$31.58

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$13.39–$74.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great54%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great373.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay3.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+11.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$118K

$118K/yr · 101K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

20 falling

Sellers

22

Top-5 brand share

54%

Open market

40%

  • InMotion Hemp17%
  • POWERED X PLANTS13%
  • Medical Miracles10%
  • Hemp Emu8%
  • BIOXPRESSEASE7%
  • Scientific Solutions Global6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$6K10%$12K15%$18K20%$24K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +11.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KHoliday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency23%

“works well”

Quality-Overall15%

“Best quality”

Joint Pain7%

“Great with joint pains”

Ease Of Use7%

“Easy to use”

Smell6%

“It's a nice fragrance”

Ease Of Application5%

“Like the ease of application”

Value For Money5%

“And the best part is its not that expensive”

Muscle Pain Relief4%

“I'm recommend to everyone with muscle pain and cramps”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Item performs as advertised”

Absorbency2%

“Absorbs pretty well”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall19%

“It doesnt do much good”

Smell17%

“This product it has a very strong & strange odor”

Value For Money11%

“Waste of Money”

Pain Relief-Overall7%

“shoulder that causes pain”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Product misrepresented”

Quality-Overall3%

“Junk”

Oily/Greasy3%

“Didnt have as much hemp oil in it as I expected”

Strength3%

“Sent is to strong”

Adhesion/Stickiness3%

“it's remains very sticky for quite a long time”

Skin Health2%

“it doesnt rurn your skin like the others do”

Top return reasons

Smell27%
Functionality-Overall19%
Advertised Vs Actual Product17%
Joint Pain5%
Ingredients-Overall5%
Leak-Proof4%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Skin Health3%
Adhesion/Stickiness3%
Product Condition3%