Skip to content
55

carboy brush

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but a small market ($71K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 18Growth 39Conversion 90Competition 41Returns 92Price range 71Avg price 76Brand share 51Review moat 44Quality gap 76

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great10.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$15.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$7.51–$32.94

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,127.95

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+11.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$71K

$71K/yr · 44K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

22%

  • DOMUEN21%
  • Rkddo18%
  • isshu16%
  • kehail12%
  • VINUM8%
  • Suseg3%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$4K10%$7K15%$11K20%$14K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +11.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Spike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Cleaning25%

“Easy to get the bottles clean”

Quality-Overall14%

“Excellent product”

Value For Money14%

“very affordable”

Size-Overall7%

“They are the perfect length”

Ease Of Use6%

“Extremely handy”

Efficiency5%

“Works well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Works as advertised”

Durability3%

“hold up very well”

Smell1%

“They smell great”

Handle Quality1%

“The handles are comfortable to hold”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall15%

“Very breakable cheap quality”

Durability9%

“Broke first use”

Size-Overall9%

“Too big”

Ease Of Cleaning7%

“they made a huge mess”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Doesnt work”

Strength6%

“They are flimsy”

Stain Resistance4%

“My husband's coffee cups can become very stained because he like his coffee dark and hot”

Ease Of Use4%

“No useful”

Value For Money3%

“Cheap”

Material Quality2%

“cheap material”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall39%
Quality-Overall14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Functionality-Overall5%
Value For Money3%
Strength3%
Cleaning Modes3%
Ease Of Cleaning2%
Material Quality2%