Skip to content
50

bruise remedy

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 98% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 41Growth 55Conversion 96Competition 21Returns 99Price range 64Avg price 79Brand share 5Review moat 23Quality gap 42

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible14.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$16.65

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.48–$30.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+27.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$209K

$209K/yr · 90K searches

Review moat

Bad8,287.2

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad75%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad98%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 75% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

588

Top-5 brand share

98%

Open market

0%

  • Boiron55%
  • PROcure24%
  • VitaMedica15%
  • Miracle Plus2%
  • PHARMBANNER2%
  • SKINTENSIVE2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$21K20%$42K30%$63K40%$84K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +27.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency18%

“Works perfectly”

Quality-Overall15%

“Overall, its an effective and reliable product that I would definitely recommend”

Inflammation7%

“Always helpf to reduce inflammation”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As Advertised”

Joint Pain5%

“Gel really helps with joint pain”

Value For Money5%

“reasonable price”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Absorbency3%

“Absorbs really well”

Muscle Pain Relief3%

“muscle relief”

Smell3%

“clean scent”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall21%

“Ineffective”

Pain Relief-Overall11%

“Sore Wrist”

Allergies7%

“Allergic to them”

Smell4%

“Smells terrible”

Value For Money4%

“Waste of money”

Inflammation3%

“not only did it keep the swelling down”

Color2%

“purple colors were faded”

Side Effects2%

“Made me sick”

Ingredients-Overall2%

“Were the ingredients changed”

Sensitivity-Overall2%

“Burns a bit when used around eyes”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall28%
Advertised Vs Actual Product14%
Size-Overall11%
Value For Money7%
Smell7%
Joint Pain3%
Leak-Proof3%
Product Condition3%
Ingredients-Overall2%
Moist/Dry2%