Skip to content
65

body deodorant for women

Launch it

A $1.3M/yr market growing +35.9% this quarter with returns at 0.2% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 82Growth 60Conversion 74Competition 79Returns 99Price range 52Avg price 37Brand share 7Review moat 24Quality gap 77

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.3M

$1.3M/yr · 1.7M searches

Competition

Great36%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good6.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Good+35.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Good$3.18–$27.97

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay$10.45

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Bad5,953.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad97%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (36% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

9 rising

Sellers

146

Top-5 brand share

97%

Open market

2%

  • Secret44%
  • Dove36%
  • Degree8%
  • Summer's Eve7%
  • Lume3%
  • HAPPY CURVES1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$38K6%$75K9%$113K12%$150K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 50 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +35.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
70K50KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell44%

“Decent smell”

Quality-Overall7%

“Great price for a quality product”

Efficiency4%

“The results are excellent”

Value For Money4%

“not expensive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As described”

Moist/Dry3%

“helps with dry skin”

Allergies3%

“No irritation”

Durability3%

“very durable”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy Use”

Size-Overall2%

“The can is a convenient size”

What buyers complain about

Smell29%

“Gross smell”

Allergies7%

“Skin Irritation”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Not effective”

Ease Of Use5%

“hard to press”

Value For Money5%

“Expensive”

Durability4%

“Breaks off”

Leak-Proof4%

“sprayer leaks”

Size-Overall2%

“Its too small”

Moist/Dry2%

“Dry very dry”

Flammable1%

“like it burned”

Top return reasons

Smell45%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Functionality-Overall10%
Product Condition5%
Size-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Value For Money3%
Material Quality3%
Leak-Proof3%
Protection1%