Skip to content
49

based under eye elixir

Skip it

A concentrated shelf (top 5 take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 45Growth 19Conversion 81Competition 0Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 94Brand share 0Review moat 99Quality gap 70

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Incredible24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Incredible$18.40–$27.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great$22.56

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great8.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$237K

$237K/yr · 125K searches

Growth

Bad-11.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3

Sellers

4

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • BASED BODYWORKS78%
  • LTNOVAAY17%
  • Generic5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%20%$47K40%$95K60%$142K80%$189K110100 Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 3 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 21 weeks — -11.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K3KSpike '26Feb '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency22%

“Works really well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“As described”

Quality-Overall11%

“a good product”

Absorbency8%

“absorbs quickly”

Suitability Dry Skin8%

“Its really moisturizing, brightens your under eyes and reduces puffiness”

Weight Light6%

“The formula feels lightweight”

Moist/Dry6%

“It provides good hydration”

Oily/Greasy6%

“The formula feels lightweight, absorbs quickly, and doesnt leave any greasy residue”

Smell6%

“Product has no smell so its great for sensitive people”

Suitability Combination Skin4%

“Overall, I found it a very good purchase for men looking to take care of the eye area in a practical and simple way”

What buyers complain about

Value For Money40%

“This one expensive more than that 3”

Dilute/Watery20%

“the product was dripping in liquid”

Motor Power20%

“waste of money pump is bad”

Design-Overall7%

“BASED needs to fix this with a better bottle design fast because it's too expensive for product to go to waste”

Functionality-Overall7%

“Pump doesn't work well”

Water Resistance7%

“After 2 uses I'm already having trouble getting the product to pump out because it's not aqueous enough”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product20%
Motor Power9%
Leak-Proof8%
Symptom Reduction6%
Product Condition6%
Value For Money6%
Certifications6%
Functionality-Overall6%
Dilute/Watery6%
Thickness3%