Skip to content
54

asian broom

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but soft demand (+0.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 33Growth 26Conversion 32Competition 45Returns 96Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 36Review moat 83Quality gap 90

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$29.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$14.89–$44.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great349

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$154K

$154K/yr · 208K searches

Conversion

Okay2.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+0.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

11 flat

Sellers

19

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

13%

  • T TABAKH47%
  • AW BROOMS16%
  • TTS For Home8%
  • COLLECT PRESENT8%
  • VIELAB5%
  • SWEEPY4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$15K20%$31K30%$46K40%$61K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +0.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Cleaning24%

“Clean”

Quality-Overall17%

“Very beautifully made”

Ease Of Use10%

“easy to use”

Durability5%

“This brand is exceptionally durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Just what she expected”

Design-Overall4%

“Beautiful design and craftsmanship”

Soft Feel3%

“This broom is surprisingly effective despite being soft”

Size-Overall3%

“Is a great size looks great”

Weight Light3%

“Perfect too because it is lightweight”

Functionality-Overall3%

“works good on your baseboards”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall28%

“Is Not Well Made”

Durability18%

“Falling apart”

Ease Of Cleaning13%

“More of a mess to clean up”

Value For Money9%

“its not worth even $2”

Functionality-Overall5%

“shook as it as much as I could that didnt help”

Size-Overall4%

“They are a bit short”

Suitable For Outdoor3%

“its not good for indoor or outdoor use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“In what appears to be false advertising the product images show 3 in a bundle”

Allergies2%

“However, if you are allergic to pollen or grass Do”

Design-Overall2%

“feels like this product is made poorly”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product16%
Quality-Overall13%
Size-Overall13%
Defective Material/Parts8%
Durability8%
Material Quality7%
Ease Of Cleaning7%
Value For Money4%
Functionality-Overall3%
Weight Heavy3%