Skip to content
39

arnica 30x

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 15Growth 21Conversion 99Competition 16Returns 99Price range 73Avg price 84Brand share 0Review moat 25Quality gap 24

Conversion

Incredible18.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$18.64

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.90–$36.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Bad4,777.33

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-8.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad81%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$59K

$59K/yr · 17K searches

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 81% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

515

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Hyland's56%
  • VitaMedica25%
  • Boiron19%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$6K20%$12K30%$18K40%$24K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 12 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 44 weeks — -8.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Holiday '25Spike '26Sep '25Oct '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency17%

“Works perfectly”

Quality-Overall15%

“Excellent Product”

Inflammation11%

“Always helpf to reduce inflammation”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Works as advertised”

Joint Pain6%

“Helps relieve painful joints”

Value For Money4%

“Worth it”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Sensitivity-Overall3%

“not bruise crazy nor did it last on my skin amazing”

Fever Relief2%

“this worked fantastic on helping to mitigate some of the bruising that I get as a age”

Natural Ingredients2%

“Natural remedy often prescribed”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall15%

“Ineffective”

Pain Relief-Overall15%

“I had zero pain relief”

Allergies9%

“Makes me itch”

Value For Money6%

“Too expensive”

Inflammation5%

“I swell terribly”

Side Effects3%

“These made me quite nauseous”

Size-Overall3%

“They were smaller”

Dosage3%

“I took too much”

Oral Hygiene2%

“The tablets do not resolve in your mouth they are extremely hard”

Ingredients-Overall2%

“Hardly any arnica in this product”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall26%
Size-Overall17%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Value For Money10%
Joint Pain5%
Leak-Proof4%
Smell3%
Product Condition3%
Texture/Consistency-Overall2%
Ingredients-Overall2%