Skip to content
53

appetite suppressant patch

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but soft demand (-41.1% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 8Growth 4Conversion 54Competition 51Returns 100Price range 79Avg price 84Brand share 76Review moat 61Quality gap 98

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible3.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$18.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$8.40–$40.56

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great59%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Good1,071.52

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good4.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Bad$31K

$31K/yr · 37K searches

Growth

Bad-41.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

69

Top-5 brand share

59%

Open market

36%

  • Arkture26%
  • OKMXBS10%
  • OLLY9%
  • KUHEE9%
  • YYSDMVY6%
  • Sankell5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$3K20%$6K30%$9K40%$12K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 38 weeks — -41.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
900700Oct '25Nov '25Jan '26Feb '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall14%

“It tastes amazing”

Ease Of Use10%

“Easy to open”

Weight Loss10%

“Help with weight loss”

Quality-Overall7%

“Great Quality and Comfortable Fit”

Energy Level4%

“Great energy”

Value For Money4%

“Great deal”

Adhesion/Stickiness3%

“The adhesive is strong”

Comfort-Overall3%

“They are very comfortable”

Ease Of Application3%

“They apply comfortably to the skin”

Flavor3%

“Excellent flavor”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall26%

“Does not work like it says”

Weight Loss11%

“no weight loss”

Value For Money5%

“Its expensive”

Taste-Overall5%

“The taste is not so appealing”

Adhesion/Stickiness5%

“Does not stick well”

Allergies5%

“Hives”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“FAKE ADVERTISEMENT”

Side Effects2%

“Dangerous side effects”

Quality-Overall2%

“Garbage”

Nutritional Content2%

“Didn't help at all with hunger”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall26%
Adhesion/Stickiness18%
Taste-Overall16%
Sour5%
Color Fading/Discoloration5%
Size-Overall5%
Inflammation5%
Itch Relief5%
Flavor5%
Weight Loss5%