Skip to content
49

antacid

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 93% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 72Growth 23Conversion 99Competition 35Returns 100Price range 57Avg price 34Brand share 17Review moat 24Quality gap 18

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible18.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$784K

$784K/yr · 428K searches

Price range

Good$5.18–$28.12

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Avg price

Okay$10.05

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Bad5,019.89

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-4.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad93%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

115

Top-5 brand share

93%

Open market

3%

  • Amazon Basic Care35%
  • TUMS26%
  • berkley jensen15%
  • MAJOR13%
  • RUGBY LABORATORIES5%
  • KIRKLAND3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 3%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$78K20%$157K30%$235K40%$314K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall20%

“Taste smooth”

Value For Money13%

“Best value”

Heart Health7%

“It helps heart burn”

Efficiency7%

“Seemed to work in a satisfactory manner”

Quality-Overall7%

“Excellent product”

Flavor6%

“Best flavor”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief5%

“Helps with my acid reflux”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing5%

“Best tasting chewable”

Regulates Digestion2%

“Easy to digest”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall13%

“Bad aftertaste”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing9%

“Not initially chewable”

Hard Feel7%

“Hard As Rocks”

Value For Money6%

“Not worth the price”

Flavor4%

“Horrible flavor yuck”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Didn't work for me”

Size-Overall3%

“Smaller than expected”

Heart Health3%

“Heart burn”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“It's slightly chalky in texture”

Regulates Digestion2%

“gives me acid reflux”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product100%