Skip to content
50

allergen spray

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (20.6% search→purchase), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 76Growth 21Conversion 100Competition 8Returns 98Price range 57Avg price 53Brand share 0Review moat 40Quality gap 73

Conversion

Incredible20.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$881K

$881K/yr · 345K searches

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$5.90–$27.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$12.38

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,528.88

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-8.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad91%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 91% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 falling

Sellers

10

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Clorox83%
  • Allergy Asthma Clean10%
  • Allersearch5%
  • The Ecology Works2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$88K20%$176K30%$264K40%$353K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 8 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -8.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell35%

“Clean scent”

Allergies15%

“Good for allergies”

Quality-Overall5%

“Overall, good product and easy to use”

Ease Of Use5%

“easy to control”

Spray/Flow3%

“the sprayer works well”

Efficiency3%

“Works well”

Value For Money3%

“Good value for the money”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“Great for everyday cleaning”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As advertised”

Freshness2%

“Perfect for everyday freshness”

What buyers complain about

Allergies24%

“Caused an allergic reaction”

Smell18%

“Unpleasant Smell”

Functionality-Overall7%

“I did not find this effective”

Durability5%

“Broke first use”

Leak-Proof4%

“Leaks”

Value For Money3%

“Not worth the price”

Jamming/Clogging2%

“Clogged immediately”

Quality-Overall2%

“Nozzle is poor quality”

Ease Of Use1%

“It wouldn't open”

Unsustainable Design1%

“Poor design”

Top return reasons

Smell36%
Leak-Proof18%
Functionality-Overall14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Spray/Flow3%
Value For Money2%
Stain Resistance1%
Residue1%
Size-Overall1%
Dispensing Mechanism1%