Skip to content
58

1up nutrition

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 95Growth 24Conversion 57Competition 35Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 78Quality gap 57

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$2.4M

$2.4M/yr · 1.4M searches

Avg price

Incredible$35.27

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$19.56–$53.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Great438.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good4.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-1.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

2 falling

Sellers

12

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • OATH NUTRITION95%
  • Clean Simple Eats5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$245K20%$489K30%$734K40%$978K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
50K30KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall31%

“Clean taste”

Nutritional Content18%

“Great Protein Powder”

Flavor16%

“There is a variety of flavors”

Solubility5%

“Mixes easily”

Blend/Ratio3%

“blends perfectly”

Sweetness2%

“Not overly sweet”

Freshness2%

“Its so delightfully refreshing”

Quality-Overall2%

“overall the product is very good and consistent”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“Great texture”

Value For Money1%

“Price was good”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall11%

“Weird Taste”

Solubility10%

“Does not mix well”

Flavor7%

“Flavor is hard to tolerate”

Nutritional Content5%

“Getting much nutrition in is HARD”

Value For Money5%

“A little expensive”

Sweetness4%

“Its VERY sugary”

Mixing/Blending3%

“Trouble mixing”

Artificial Sweeteners2%

“I was not pleased with the sugar substitute”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“Texture is very slightly grainy”

Thickness1%

“does not make the beverage overly thick”