Skip to content
57

small power strip

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.5%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 60Growth 24Conversion 76Competition 78Returns 85Price range 69Avg price 57Brand share 71Review moat 21Quality gap 18

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Conversion

Great7.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good63%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$4.63–$38.41

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$509K

$509K/yr · 542K searches

Avg price

Good$12.83

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Bad-2.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad10,834.04

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

26 flat

Sellers

46

Top-5 brand share

63%

Open market

33%

  • One Beat18%
  • GE18%
  • TESSAN12%
  • Anker8%
  • okleeic8%
  • Gerass5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$15K6%$31K9%$46K12%$61K101001K10K100K1.0M Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 45 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -2.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '24Black Friday '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall14%

“Good Quality”

Socket/Port/Plug13%

“all the ports work well”

Charging10%

“Charges very quickly”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Just what i needed”

Ease Of Use8%

“Very handy”

Value For Money7%

“Excellent value”

Portability5%

“Small and easy to carry”

Size-Overall5%

“Perfect size for travel”

Design-Overall4%

“Compact design”

Compactness3%

“Compact and Powerful”

What buyers complain about

Durability18%

“Didn't Last”

Socket/Port/Plug10%

“USB ports dont work”

Charging9%

“Charges VERY slow”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Never worked”

Noise Level7%

“Makes noise”

Quality-Overall7%

“very cheap, both in price and quality”

Size-Overall4%

“It's small”

Heating2%

“Gets very hot”

Value For Money2%

“Too expensive for me”

Flammable1%

“Fire Hazard”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall28%
Charging12%
Socket/Port/Plug10%
Functionality-Overall9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Compatibility-Overall7%
Value For Money5%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Weight Heavy2%
Connectivity-Overall2%