Skip to content
69

power strip long cord

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.2%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 60Growth 69Conversion 83Competition 83Returns 91Price range 73Avg price 78Brand share 90Review moat 23Quality gap 18

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Great45%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Conversion

Great8.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$16.14

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.07–$42.16

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+50.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Good$510K

$510K/yr · 353K searches

Review moat

Bad8,399.67

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

45 rising

Sellers

70

Top-5 brand share

45%

Open market

49%

  • SUPERDANNY15%
  • One Beat9%
  • Addtam8%
  • GE7%
  • LeZone6%
  • HOVEOX6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$10K4%$20K6%$31K8%$41K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 69 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 11 weeks — +50.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '26May '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“the build quality is great”

Socket/Port/Plug14%

“Love the USB ports”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“Looks Exactly As Pictured”

Value For Money9%

“Fair price”

Charging7%

“charges well”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to handle”

Design-Overall4%

“Sleek design”

Size-Overall3%

“I really like the size”

Strength3%

“Solid product”

Portability3%

“Great for traveling”

What buyers complain about

Durability17%

“Didnt last”

Socket/Port/Plug9%

“Most plugs wont fit”

Quality-Overall8%

“Cheap quality”

Charging8%

“Slow charging”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Not Completely Functional”

Noise Level8%

“High pitched noises”

Size-Overall4%

“It's small”

Heating3%

“Overheating”

Value For Money3%

“Too expensive for me”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“false advertisement”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall21%
Functionality-Overall11%
Socket/Port/Plug10%
Value For Money9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Defective Material/Parts6%
Charging4%
Add-Ons/Attachments4%
Compatibility-Overall3%
Color3%