Skip to content
59

pdu

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($54.40 avg), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 71Growth 23Conversion 50Competition 62Returns 86Price range 70Avg price 92Brand share 75Review moat 70Quality gap 27

Avg price

Great$54.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Good60%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good$749K

$749K/yr · 344K searches

Review moat

Good712.25

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$19.98–$134.75

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-3.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 flat

Sellers

128

Top-5 brand share

60%

Open market

32%

  • CyberPower18%
  • StarTech.com14%
  • HHSOET10%
  • TRIPP LITE9%
  • ElecVoztile9%
  • Tecmojo8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$30K8%$60K12%$90K16%$120K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -3.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KHoliday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall19%

“Good quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“Works just as it should”

Value For Money9%

“Well worth it”

Strength8%

“looks very solidly built”

Size-Overall7%

“The units size is good”

Socket/Port/Plug7%

“Works great, all the sockets hold plugs well and the switches are all pretty hard to flip by accident”

Assembly/Installation6%

“No issues mounting/installing”

Design-Overall4%

“The design is great”

Ease Of Use4%

“easy to use”

Durability3%

“strong and durable”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall15%

“Too large”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING”

Quality-Overall9%

“Cheap quality”

Socket/Port/Plug6%

“Unfortunately, the usb ports are broken”

Defective Material/Parts5%

“PART MISSING”

Product Condition4%

“Passes current but defective. Plugged a tree pole electrical tester. Has hot neatral reverse. Does not condition power.”

Material Quality3%

“I had employed a series of cheap plastic power strips”

Functionality-Overall3%

“the lights on the frist switch does not work out of the box”

Weight Heavy2%

“The cables are weighty”

Charging2%

“It is either too low on voltage or there is a problem with the charging circuit overall”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall28%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Functionality-Overall11%
Defective Material/Parts10%
Socket/Port/Plug7%
Compatibility-Overall6%
Value For Money4%
Quality-Overall3%
Product Condition3%
Weight Heavy1%