Skip to content
54

extension cord holder

Worth a look

Shows low returns (1.1%), but soft demand (+3.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 29Conversion 70Competition 58Returns 92Price range 42Avg price 48Brand share 71Review moat 32Quality gap 30

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good6.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Good$375K

$375K/yr · 499K searches

Avg price

Okay$11.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay$3.42–$23.42

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay3,272.42

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+3.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 flat

Sellers

157

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

33%

  • ZTSXLLIM22%
  • UNIS15%
  • BAYCO11%
  • Woods8%
  • Wowangce5%
  • Black Duck Brand5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$15K8%$30K12%$45K16%$60K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 31 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +3.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“Excellent product”

Ease Of Use16%

“EASY TO USE”

Value For Money12%

“Good for price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“As advertised”

Efficiency6%

“Does the job”

Storage Capacity4%

“Excellent storage”

Durability4%

“seem very durable with them being made out of quality material”

Strength4%

“The triangle clips are strong”

Size-Overall3%

“great fit”

Organizing Capabilities3%

“Great organizing product”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“this is just not going to fit”

Strength13%

“Little weak”

Quality-Overall11%

“Not good quality”

Adhesion/Stickiness10%

“does not stick to wall”

Durability6%

“is easy to break”

Ease Of Use5%

“Difficult to remove”

Material Quality4%

“The material doesnt feel durable”

Thickness3%

“They are thinner then expected”

Value For Money3%

“$9 for one of this is ridiculous”

Add-Ons/Attachments2%

“they don't stay attached to the wall”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Adhesion/Stickiness6%
Functionality-Overall6%
Add-Ons/Attachments6%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Value For Money4%
Strength4%
Quality-Overall3%
Material Quality2%