Skip to content
57

black extension cord

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (11.9% search→purchase), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 62Growth 43Conversion 94Competition 52Returns 85Price range 68Avg price 54Brand share 66Review moat 20Quality gap 15

Conversion

Great11.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Good$5.57–$34.78

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Good$552K

$552K/yr · 372K searches

Avg price

Good$12.52

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+14.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad13,251.27

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

30%

  • Seeklyze22%
  • Amazon Basics21%
  • Skrizcable8%
  • LitStar7%
  • HANYCONY7%
  • Yintar4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$28K10%$55K15%$83K20%$110K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +14.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KHoliday '24Spike '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall21%

“The build quality feels solid”

Advertised Vs Actual Product15%

“As Advertised”

Value For Money11%

“value for money”

Socket/Port/Plug8%

“there are ample ports”

Strength5%

“Good balance of strength and functionality”

Durability4%

“Feels durable”

Charging4%

“Works great, USBC fast charges”

Add-Ons/Attachments4%

“A great extension for any situation”

Ease Of Use4%

“Very handy”

Size-Overall2%

“A good fit”

What buyers complain about

Durability14%

“After 1 month”

Quality-Overall12%

“Bad Quality”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Hard to tell if working”

Socket/Port/Plug5%

“USB outlet not working”

Charging5%

“wasnt successful on a charge”

Heating4%

“gets hot nearly instantly”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Fault advertisement”

Size-Overall3%

“Doesn't fit”

Value For Money3%

“found another brand cheaper”

Strength3%

“Cheaply made flimsy”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall21%
Add-Ons/Attachments10%
Value For Money10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Functionality-Overall8%
Socket/Port/Plug7%
Compatibility-Overall5%
Quality-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Thin2%