Skip to content
50

wrestling shoes

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 22% of clicks), but weak search conversion (0.2%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 64Growth 9Conversion 3Competition 93Returns 21Price range 51Avg price 89Brand share 67Review moat 65Quality gap 58

Competition

Great22%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$62.82

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good913.97

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good$587K

$587K/yr · 4.2M searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$15.66–$180.00

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Bad6.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-31.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (22% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

25 rising

Sellers

98

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

29%

  • Sisttke24%
  • ASICS12%
  • Hayabusa10%
  • adidas10%
  • KEFUWU8%
  • SD SDTDID7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$12K4%$23K6%$35K8%$47K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 120 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -31.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
250K150KBlack Friday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall18%

“Amazing fit”

Comfort-Overall17%

“Very comfortable”

Quality-Overall15%

“Overall, a very useful and well-designed product, especially for regular training”

Value For Money8%

“Good Value”

Exercise/Sports Suitability6%

“Good for walking”

Grip4%

“feels comfortable in hand”

Durability3%

“The material feels durable and well-made, and they fit perfectly”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“These function as advertised”

Weight Light3%

“Very lightweight”

Ease Of Use3%

“are easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall19%

“runs big”

Quality-Overall16%

“Very disappointed with the quality of these shoes”

Durability15%

“not very durable”

Comfort-Overall4%

“Not very comfortable”

Cushion4%

“Padding inside is horrible”

Value For Money2%

“which cost an additional $40”

Water Resistance2%

“I would not endorse this pair for anything involving water-wear”

Weight Heavy1%

“A bit bulky”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“Not gel. Product description was stated as gel and clearly their is a foam substance that is used in the glove, firm”

Product Condition1%

“Item was sent used”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall45%
Feet Fit21%
Length8%
Width8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Comfort-Overall2%
Cushion2%
Quality-Overall1%
Value For Money1%
Weight Heavy1%