Skip to content
53

womens athletic shorts 5 inch inseam

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 13% of clicks), but a small market ($14K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 3Growth 93Conversion 6Competition 97Returns 4Price range 81Avg price 94Brand share 68Review moat 25Quality gap 67

Competition

Incredible13%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$22.74

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Great+103.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Great$7.80–$49.29

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good64%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad4,089.99

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad11.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$14K

$14K/yr · 139K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (13% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

54 rising

Sellers

111

Top-5 brand share

64%

Open market

33%

  • baleaf47%
  • G Gradual5%
  • MAGCOMSEN5%
  • Lee4%
  • luvamia3%
  • Blouty2%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$1392%$2783%$4184%$5571101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 215 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +103.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 12.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall27%

“not too tight”

Comfort-Overall19%

“is comfortable for me”

Pockets/Compartments5%

“Nice pockets”

Quality-Overall5%

“The quality feels really solid”

Color4%

“Colors are nice variety”

Weight Light4%

“So lightweight and comfortable”

Material Quality3%

“Good material”

Soft Feel3%

“Soft fabric”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“There is a good stretch”

Value For Money2%

“Good price”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall27%

“Too short”

Material Quality6%

“Cheap material”

Quality-Overall4%

“cheap”

Color2%

“No navy blue”

Thickness2%

“They are a thinner”

Value For Money2%

“Total waste of money”

Pockets/Compartments2%

“No Pockets”

Comfort-Overall2%

“Not super comfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Pictures are deceiving”

Thigh Fit2%

“Not good unless you are very thin with no thigh gap”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall50%
Waist Fit11%
Length8%
Material Quality6%
Thigh Fit6%
Hip Fit4%
Inseam Fit3%
Shape/Style2%
Thin2%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%