Skip to content
46

womens+activewear+leggings

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.6%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 8Growth 9Conversion 7Competition 96Returns 21Price range 82Avg price 92Brand share 95Review moat 24Quality gap 72

Competition

Incredible15%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Incredible37%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Avg price

Great$21.74

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$6.45–$58.64

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad5,807.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad6.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-31.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$31K

$31K/yr · 248K searches

Conversion

Bad0.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

63 falling

Sellers

86

Top-5 brand share

37%

Open market

59%

  • Reebok15%
  • Amazon Essentials8%
  • RBX5%
  • L'eggs5%
  • THE GYM PEOPLE4%
  • CHRLEISURE4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$6144%$1K6%$2K8%$2K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 148 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -31.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall19%

“Fit as expected”

Comfort-Overall19%

“Comfortable to wear”

Soft Feel12%

“Softest leggings”

Quality-Overall6%

“Amazing quality”

Value For Money5%

“Excellent value”

Pockets/Compartments5%

“love the pockets”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“Good stretch”

Material Quality3%

“Light material”

Transparency2%

“Not see through”

Thickness2%

“The material is thick enough”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall14%

“Too short”

Smell9%

“Awful smell”

Transparency8%

“Transparent”

Thickness6%

“To thick”

Material Quality5%

“clingy material”

Quality-Overall5%

“Low quality”

Thin2%

“Thin material”

Waist Fit2%

“were tight around waist”

Durability2%

“falling apart”

Color2%

“Wish they were a little darker in color”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall31%
Waist Fit19%
Material Quality10%
Thin7%
Length5%
Transparency4%
Thigh Fit3%
Inseam Fit3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Hip Fit2%