Skip to content
55

white leggings for women

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 48% of clicks), but high returns (7.3%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 58Growth 31Conversion 36Competition 81Returns 19Price range 72Avg price 75Brand share 87Review moat 22Quality gap 73

Brand share

Great48%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$14.94

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$5.31–$39.70

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$462K

$462K/yr · 1.1M searches

Conversion

Okay2.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Okay+4.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad9,045.11

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad7.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

38 rising

Sellers

42

Top-5 brand share

48%

Open market

48%

  • CHARMKING17%
  • Bluemaple12%
  • Fawarior7%
  • Walifrey6%
  • TNNZEET5%
  • VALANDY4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$14K6%$28K9%$42K12%$55K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 65 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 103 weeks — +4.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
80K60KSpike '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall22%

“fit as expected”

Comfort-Overall15%

“Perfect comfortable”

Soft Feel12%

“So soft”

Quality-Overall8%

“They seem to be well-made”

Material Quality4%

“The material is substantial”

Value For Money4%

“Great value”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“The fabric is stretchy and soft”

Transparency2%

“Not see through”

Thickness2%

“Great thickness, opacity great”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“Great for sports”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“Too short”

Transparency10%

“SEE through”

Thickness6%

“Cons: Not thick enough”

Quality-Overall5%

“Poor Quality”

Material Quality5%

“Horrible material”

Smell3%

“They smell awful”

Thin2%

“Very thin”

Waist Fit2%

“Too tight banding at waist”

Color2%

“It was like a faded color of blue”

Compression2%

“No compression”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall31%
Waist Fit19%
Material Quality10%
Thin6%
Transparency6%
Length5%
Thigh Fit3%
Inseam Fit3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Hip Fit2%