Skip to content
53

under armour sunglasses men

Worth a look

Shows a fragmented shelf (top 5 take 15% of clicks), but weak search conversion (1.1%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 44Growth 54Conversion 13Competition 96Returns 45Price range 20Avg price 92Brand share 32Review moat 57Quality gap 62

Competition

Incredible15%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$52.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,231.25

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+26.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Okay3.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$234K

$234K/yr · 418K searches

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Bad$10.30–$445.22

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

32 rising

Sellers

121

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

13%

  • Under Armour43%
  • Nike36%
  • Shady Rays3%
  • adidas2%
  • Tifosi2%
  • goodr1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (26 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$2K2%$5K3%$7K4%$9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 174 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall20%

“Great quality glasses”

Value For Money20%

“Good value for money”

Size-Overall14%

“Very comfortable fit”

Comfort-Overall10%

“Comfortable too”

Weight Light6%

“These glasses are also exceptionally lightweight”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“As described”

Color4%

“Great color choices”

Durability3%

“Great product really durable and came quickly”

Shape/Style3%

“Stylish look”

Design-Overall2%

“GREAT DESIGN”

What buyers complain about

Quality-Overall16%

“Fragile low quality”

Size-Overall16%

“Weird fit”

Durability14%

“didn't last”

Value For Money5%

“expensive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Not as advertised”

Comfort-Overall3%

“and uncomfortable”

Color3%

“it was black”

Material Quality3%

“The materials felt warped”

Strength2%

“Too fragile”

Connectivity-Overall2%

“Connections have been unstoppable”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall60%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Color5%
Shape/Style5%
Quality-Overall3%
Value For Money3%
Comfort-Overall3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Width2%
Product Condition1%