Skip to content
49

under armour football cleats

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.2%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 9Growth 71Conversion 2Competition 97Returns 3Price range 57Avg price 92Brand share 50Review moat 86Quality gap 50

Competition

Incredible14%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$54.51

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great274.12

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+52.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Good$0.10–$149.99

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good75%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Bad$38K

$38K/yr · 365K searches

Returns

Bad11.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (14% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 rising

Sellers

128

Top-5 brand share

75%

Open market

19%

  • Under Armour33%
  • adidas19%
  • HRJR9%
  • Phenom Elite8%
  • Favdeol7%
  • Venum6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$7564%$2K6%$2K8%$3K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 179 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +52.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
45K35KHoliday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall35%

“fit just as they should”

Quality-Overall14%

“Quality good”

Comfort-Overall13%

“Extremely comfortable”

Value For Money7%

“Great value”

Durability6%

“durable these cleats are”

Feet Fit4%

“Other then that it fits my foot nicely”

Weight Light3%

“These cleats are lightweight”

Color3%

“Colors were nice”

Material Quality2%

“The upper material is flexible”

Grippers/Spikes/Cleats1%

“Grip You Can Count On”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall33%

“Run a bit small”

Quality-Overall12%

“Horrible quality”

Width7%

“Not super narrow”

Product Condition7%

“Used- not new”

Comfort-Overall5%

“Comfort wise, theyre terrible”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth the price”

Durability4%

“it doesnt look like it can last long after the first week of play i alrerady began to see signs of wear and tear”

Flexibility1%

“The shoe feels like it's stiff plastic and not flexible”

Feet Fit1%

“Don't buy if you have wide feet”

Material Quality1%

“Very cheap material use just bought them a month 1/2 ago”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall38%
Feet Fit28%
Width15%
Length12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Comfort-Overall1%
Value For Money1%
Ankle Support1%
Color0%
Quality-Overall0%