Skip to content
31

travis scott shoes

Skip it

A small market ($0/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 0Growth 23Conversion 0Competition 81Returns 21Price range 7Avg price 50Brand share 37Review moat 42Quality gap 48

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Good$176.51

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay2,340.3

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Okay83%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Bad-5.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Bad7.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Bad$8.47–$1156.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad$0

$0/yr · 256K searches

Conversion

Bad0.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

14 rising

Sellers

147

Top-5 brand share

83%

Open market

13%

  • Nike34%
  • NDTEZUGT24%
  • Reebok15%
  • Jordan6%
  • TravisMathew6%
  • AIR JORDAN4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 13%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$04%$06%$08%$01101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)5 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 47 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 71 weeks — -5.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KPrime Day '25Black Friday '25MarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall20%

“Comfortable fit”

Quality-Overall18%

“Top Quality Shoe”

Size-Overall17%

“True to Size”

Value For Money13%

“Great value”

Shape/Style5%

“Great styling”

Durability4%

“Very durable and comfortable”

Color3%

“I love the black and white color pattern”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to go on”

Stitch/Finish/Polish3%

“the ends are finished well so they do not fray when you pull them through tighter eyelets”

Design-Overall2%

“The black and white pattern looks so stylish”

What buyers complain about

Width12%

“Also, Nike does not make a wide sneaker so anything that says wide is not correct”

Size-Overall11%

“Incorrect sizing”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Not good for travis phantoms”

Product Condition8%

“These seem like they have been worn before”

Quality-Overall8%

“Poor quality”

Feet Fit8%

“I wear 11 1/2 in women's not really big feet friendly”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“They do not stretch out”

Comfort-Overall3%

“may not be very convenient”

Thickness2%

“They also are a little thicker”

Value For Money2%

“Kind of pricey for laces”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall34%
Feet Fit25%
Width12%
Length9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Color3%
Material Quality2%
Comfort-Overall2%
Shape/Style2%
Quality-Overall1%