Skip to content
39

trainers

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.2%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 11Growth 21Conversion 3Competition 97Returns 14Price range 17Avg price 86Brand share 60Review moat 23Quality gap 53

Competition

Incredible13%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$68.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad8,534.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-7.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad$19.33–$503.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Bad8.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$45K

$45K/yr · 299K searches

Conversion

Bad0.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (13% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

37 rising

Sellers

152

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

26%

  • Reebok21%
  • Under Armour21%
  • Nike10%
  • New Balance9%
  • adidas7%
  • Flux Footwear4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%1%$4512%$9023%$1K4%$2K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 231 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -7.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KPrime Day '24Spike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall28%

“Comfortable Shoes”

Size-Overall18%

“true to fit”

Value For Money9%

“Great value”

Quality-Overall8%

“Amazing quality”

Exercise/Sports Suitability4%

“Good for walking”

Weight Light3%

“Very lightweight and breathable”

Durability2%

“Very durable shoes”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Appears to work as described”

Heel Support1%

“The support of the heel is good for him”

Ease Of Use1%

“easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall20%

“Runs large”

Durability9%

“Didnt last at all”

Quality-Overall7%

“the quality not as robust”

Comfort-Overall7%

“It was uncomfortable”

Feet Fit3%

“it seems they're a bit tight in the toe box”

Pain Relief-Overall3%

“they rubbed my heel to the point of bleeding”

Cushion2%

“No cushion”

Value For Money2%

“That really makes these shoes a poor value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Not as what is shown”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“Bad for long distance runs”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall27%
Feet Fit26%
Length14%
Width12%
Comfort-Overall4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Color2%
Shape/Style2%
Material Quality1%
Product Condition1%