Skip to content
44

track spikes

Skip it

Soft demand (-65.1% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 38Growth 0Conversion 5Competition 96Returns 37Price range 45Avg price 95Brand share 40Review moat 71Quality gap 53

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Incredible$42.43

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good678.83

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Okay$5.74–$193.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$193K

$193K/yr · 1.1M searches

Returns

Okay4.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-65.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

23 rising

Sellers

74

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

17%

  • Zakey32%
  • Ifrich30%
  • THESTRON12%
  • WESHIRUN4%
  • ASICS4%
  • Nike2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (17 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$4K4%$8K6%$12K8%$15K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 141 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -65.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
125K75KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar, Apr · busiest ÷ quietest = 17.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall18%

“As Good As Name Brand”

Value For Money12%

“Affordable for sure”

Size-Overall11%

“Fits well according to sizer guide”

Grip10%

“I did not slip at all”

Ease Of Use8%

“easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“They work as advertised”

Comfort-Overall6%

“are very comfortable”

Durability5%

“they've held up”

Sharpness3%

“Sharp”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“overall good for my walking”

What buyers complain about

Durability16%

“They broke very soon after using”

Quality-Overall13%

“Not good quality”

Size-Overall11%

“if your shoes are 10 or larger you might want a bigger size”

Material Quality4%

“cheap like plastic”

Strength4%

“I'm not strong enough to pull them on”

Ease Of Use3%

“A little hard to get on”

Comfort-Overall3%

“the comfort wasnt there either dont buy these for the love of god save your money”

Length3%

“Laces are quite long”

Grip3%

“The only time they were a hassle was when we were walking in fresh snow. the snow would build up inside the grips”

Functionality-Overall3%

“WILL NOT WORK”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall41%
Feet Fit23%
Length10%
Width5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Value For Money3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Quality-Overall2%
Color1%
Comfort-Overall1%