Skip to content
35

tenis fila para hombre

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.1%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 4Growth 17Conversion 1Competition 96Returns 20Price range 28Avg price 77Brand share 36Review moat 33Quality gap 47

Competition

Incredible15%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$93.22

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay84%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay3,187.33

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Okay$18.80–$307.57

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Bad7.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-15.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$17K

$17K/yr · 179K searches

Conversion

Bad0.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (15% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

26 rising

Sellers

374

Top-5 brand share

84%

Open market

14%

  • Nike63%
  • Jordan7%
  • Fila7%
  • Reebok3%
  • K-Swiss3%
  • PUMA2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (20 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$3344%$6696%$1K8%$1K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 135 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 99 weeks — -15.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KHoliday '24Black Friday '25Holiday '25DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall25%

“So comfortable”

Size-Overall21%

“Shoe was initially the correct fit”

Quality-Overall13%

“Great quality”

Value For Money8%

“Decent value”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“It was exactly what I wanted”

Durability4%

“they still look new after months of use”

Design-Overall3%

“I love the design”

Shape/Style3%

“They look stylish and feel great”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“Great shoes good for gym”

Ease Of Use2%

“Quick and easy”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall27%

“Laces are too short”

Comfort-Overall9%

“Not comfortable at all”

Product Condition8%

“got dirty used shoes”

Feet Fit6%

“Not for wide feet”

Quality-Overall6%

“Seems quality in Nike below $120 are lacking”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Its nothing like the photo”

Durability3%

“Durability questionable”

Stitch/Finish/Polish3%

“stitching is bad”

Leather Quality3%

“the leather stretch is not good dont know why”

Color3%

“Wrong color shoes sent”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall30%
Feet Fit27%
Width16%
Length9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Comfort-Overall3%
Color2%
Product Condition2%
Material Quality2%
Shape/Style1%