Skip to content
40

taylor swift 22 costume

Skip it

High returns (12.9%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 1Growth 15Conversion 17Competition 69Returns 0Price range 73Avg price 82Brand share 74Review moat 75Quality gap 70

Avg price

Great$17.97

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Good515.4

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good61%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$5.79–$39.58

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good44%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Bad1.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-20.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$4K

$4K/yr · 17K searches

Returns

Bad12.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 44% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 rising

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

61%

Open market

34%

  • LUBERLIN18%
  • Shaperdiva15%
  • Mealah12%
  • SpareCruise9%
  • Mokkin7%
  • WFIAOUESS5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$1256%$2519%$37612%$5011101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -20.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 65.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Nice quality, size accurate”

Shape/Style15%

“I think they really really elevated my look”

Value For Money15%

“Great price point”

Size-Overall11%

“Nice quality, size accurate”

Comfort-Overall8%

“comfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Accurate description”

Durability5%

“Great product and durable”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to put on”

Material Quality3%

“The shirt is made of thick enough cotton as to not be see through”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity1%

“The shirt is a nice, smooth, stretchy fabric”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall30%

“Super tight”

Color12%

“Not the best color for me”

Durability8%

“the diamonds fall off easily”

Brightness/Shine/Glow7%

“I thought they would sparkle more”

Quality-Overall7%

“They look very cheap”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“In the photo advertisement. the only photo most people look at”

Print Quality3%

“Unfortunately, the letters quickly fade after washing”

Product Condition2%

“Seemed used”

Ankle Support2%

“the rhinestone-age stops at the ankle of the stockings”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“Product seemed already stretches out and worn”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall38%
Color17%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Length6%
Waist Fit4%
Material Quality4%
Quality-Overall3%
Value For Money3%
Shape/Style2%
Thigh Fit2%