Skip to content
56

star pins

Worth a look

Shows a thin review moat (55 avg reviews), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 11Growth 96Conversion 27Competition 44Returns 88Price range 61Avg price 70Brand share 59Review moat 97Quality gap 48

Review moat

Incredible55.26

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Incredible+147.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Great1.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good$14.45

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.07–$28.88

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay59%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay2.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$45K

$45K/yr · 146K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 59% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

19

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

26%

  • Lyrow36%
  • Huquary9%
  • Tichso9%
  • DISCAO8%
  • GKDFK7%
  • Solsew5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$5K20%$9K30%$14K40%$18K1101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 23 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +147.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall34%

“Very nice quality”

Design-Overall11%

“The color and design is consistent throughout the set”

Brightness/Shine/Glow9%

“Bright and shiny and full of joy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“exactly as described in the listing”

Gifting Purpose9%

“They bring a huge smile to the recipient and me”

Strength7%

“they feel sturdy and well crafted”

Fastener Quality5%

“Good clasp”

Sharpness5%

“Look sharpe”

Durability4%

“We've had no trouble with these falling off”

Size-Overall2%

“is just the right size. not too big”

What buyers complain about

Fastener Quality25%

“Clasps don't stay on”

Defective Material/Parts13%

“The pins do not work”

Color13%

“The stars arrive all striped”

Add-Ons/Attachments13%

“wouldnt stay attached”

Strength13%

“Loose backs”

Quality-Overall10%

“The major dislike is that these are very cheap”

Ease Of Use6%

“I am disappointed the backs are hard to squeeze open”

Material Quality4%

“the poor quality material of the pin backing is so thin that TWO of these pins drove through the rear of the pin holder”

Thickness4%

“Theyre not as thin as a normal thumbtack”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall49%
Functionality-Overall8%
Value For Money5%
Fastener Quality5%
Scratch Resistance4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Quality-Overall4%
Metal Authenticity3%
Locking Mechanism3%