Skip to content
35

shamrock glasses

Skip it

Soft demand (-98.1% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 17Growth 0Conversion 27Competition 75Returns 22Price range 22Avg price 34Brand share 82Review moat 64Quality gap 24

Brand share

Great53%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great40%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good925.59

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Avg price

Okay$10.05

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Okay2.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Bad6.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Bad$3.85–$18.10

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Bad$68K

$68K/yr · 310K searches

Growth

Bad-98.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (40% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

53%

Open market

47%

  • AMCAMI13%
  • AGGKKY13%
  • Go Ho8%
  • ArtCreativity7%
  • Semato7%
  • Uintoon7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$3K8%$5K12%$8K16%$11K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 22 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -98.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 125.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Good quality”

Color15%

“Love the color”

Size-Overall13%

“These glasses fit well”

Comfort-Overall10%

“Comfortable and gorgeous”

Value For Money6%

“Great Value”

Durability5%

“These are durable”

Fun/Entertainment Experience5%

“Festive Fun”

Shape/Style5%

“the shapes are consistent”

Strength4%

“not flimsy at all”

Design-Overall3%

“The design is super cute and eye-catching”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“they are ill-fitting”

Durability11%

“They broke after wearing one time”

Comfort-Overall7%

“not so comfy”

Quality-Overall6%

“But they are cheap”

Material Quality5%

“they're cheap plastic”

Strength4%

“Very flimsy and Thebes pieces are not straight”

Value For Money3%

“look more expensive than they actually are”

Color3%

“Much Darker Green than anticipated”

Shape/Style2%

“immediately started bending the glasses out of shape with out even trying”

Asymmetry2%

“Very flimsy and Thebes pieces are not straight”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall56%
Shape/Style9%
Color6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Quality-Overall6%
Value For Money5%
Material Quality3%
Comfort-Overall1%
Width1%
Defective Material/Parts1%