Skip to content
44

round glasses

Skip it

Soft demand (-13.8% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 30Growth 18Conversion 28Competition 61Returns 25Price range 64Avg price 62Brand share 81Review moat 25Quality gap 67

Brand share

Great54%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$5.84–$31.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$13.38

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Good48%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$136K

$136K/yr · 460K searches

Conversion

Okay2.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad4,435

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Okay5.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Bad-13.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 48% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

25

Top-5 brand share

54%

Open market

41%

  • SOHUPAC23%
  • KALIYADI10%
  • CGID10%
  • TIJN6%
  • ANZIW5%
  • Brigtlaiff5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$14K20%$27K30%$41K40%$54K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Prime Day '25Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“the case is of very good quality”

Value For Money12%

“Great Value”

Shape/Style11%

“Cute style”

Comfort-Overall11%

“Comfortable and Durable”

Size-Overall10%

“the fit is The fit is comfortable”

Weight Light9%

“They feel lightweight on the face”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“just like the photo”

Color4%

“Great color assortment”

Design-Overall3%

“Nice classic design”

Eye-Hygiene2%

“Really good for dry eyes”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall18%

“They are small”

Quality-Overall10%

“cheap quality”

Durability6%

“Broke with regular use, first time”

Strength6%

“Kind of flimsy”

Blue Light Filter6%

“Dont block blue light”

Color5%

“They are very dark”

Lenses4%

“Poor quality lense”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“not accurate to the pictures”

Material Quality3%

“cheap material”

Comfort-Overall3%

“Not comfortable”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall63%
Shape/Style12%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Width4%
Quality-Overall3%
Value For Money2%
Color2%
Functionality-Overall1%
Lenses1%
Material Quality1%