Skip to content
52

rain pants women

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($29.80 avg), but high returns (17.5%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 80Conversion 15Competition 79Returns 0Price range 93Avg price 95Brand share 43Review moat 41Quality gap 70

Avg price

Incredible$29.80

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$13.24–$79.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Great+73.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Great36%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,440.77

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$104K

$104K/yr · 287K searches

Conversion

Bad1.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad17.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (36% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

50

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

17%

  • 33,000ft35%
  • iCreek21%
  • baleaf9%
  • FROGG TOGGS7%
  • Columbia7%
  • Outdoor Ventures4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (11 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$4K8%$8K12%$12K16%$17K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 48 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +73.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall21%

“They fit like a dream”

Comfort-Overall12%

“Super comfortable”

Quality-Overall7%

“Affordable quality”

Warmth5%

“so they have the added benefit of providing a bit of warmth on a chilly day”

Weather Proof4%

“Good for wind”

Pockets/Compartments4%

“Super comfortable and I love all the pockets”

Weight Light4%

“Nice light weight option for walking, running & hiking”

Water Resistance3%

“Great waterproof pants”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“Great daily wear pants”

Value For Money3%

“Great bargain”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall21%

“Too short”

Water Resistance8%

“Water RESISTANT not water proof”

Durability6%

“ripped pretty fast”

Quality-Overall4%

“Fairly cheap”

Drying Time3%

“Didn't work on keeping me dry”

Thickness3%

“not very thick”

Thigh Fit2%

“Baggy thighs”

Smell2%

“Funky smell despite washing”

Comfort-Overall2%

“it can feel pretty uncomfortable”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity2%

“If you don't want the elastic at the ankle”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall50%
Waist Fit9%
Length8%
Material Quality5%
Hip Fit5%
Inseam Fit5%
Thigh Fit4%
Thin2%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Shape/Style1%