Skip to content
42

quay aviator sunglasses for women

Skip it

A small market ($17K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 4Growth 48Conversion 14Competition 78Returns 23Price range 94Avg price 93Brand share 24Review moat 51Quality gap 50

Price range

Great$13.50–$98.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great$49.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good1,446.65

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+18.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad90%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Returns

Bad6.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$17K

$17K/yr · 32K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

13 rising

Sellers

43

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

8%

  • QUAY75%
  • FEISEDY7%
  • goodr4%
  • SORVINO3%
  • ANDWOOD2%
  • SOJOS2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 8%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$6918%$1K12%$2K16%$3K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 97 weeks — +18.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Apr, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“They are good quality I thought for sure they were going to be flimsy”

Size-Overall13%

“they fit really comfortably”

Value For Money11%

“they are affordable”

Shape/Style11%

“I loved the style”

Comfort-Overall10%

“They are so comfortable”

Weight Light10%

“Lightweight and comfortable”

Color5%

“Nice appearance in terms of coloring”

Design-Overall3%

“These are beautifully constructed”

Strength3%

“They are sturdy”

Durability3%

“The frame is feels very durable”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall25%

“too big”

Quality-Overall15%

“Seems like a quality control issue”

Durability9%

“But broke after one week”

Value For Money6%

“Very disappointed with the price point”

Strength5%

“flimsy”

Color3%

“I just wish they were darker”

Product Condition2%

“Definitely not new”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“The other pics are deceiving tbh”

Stiffness1%

“Its just the stiffness”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity1%

“they dont stretch after one wear like most sunglasses”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall64%
Shape/Style8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Color5%
Quality-Overall4%
Value For Money2%
Width2%
Material Quality1%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Strength1%