Skip to content
46

purple leggings for women

Skip it

Soft demand (-39.6% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 28Growth 5Conversion 14Competition 87Returns 15Price range 74Avg price 81Brand share 95Review moat 23Quality gap 68

Brand share

Incredible38%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great28%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$17.52

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$6.80–$38.82

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Okay$118K

$118K/yr · 605K searches

Review moat

Bad7,270.21

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Bad8.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-39.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (28% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

44 rising

Sellers

52

Top-5 brand share

38%

Open market

57%

  • VALANDY9%
  • YUDSUD8%
  • CRZ YOGA8%
  • YEOREO7%
  • FULLSOFT6%
  • KOWBEAR5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$2K4%$5K6%$7K8%$9K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 75 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 103 weeks — -39.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KSpike '24Spike '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 16.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall15%

“Easy fit”

Soft Feel14%

“Butter soft”

Comfort-Overall14%

“Extremely comfortable”

Quality-Overall6%

“They seem to be well-made”

Color5%

“Cute colors”

Value For Money4%

“Good deal”

Material Quality4%

“Soft material”

Thickness3%

“These are thick pants”

Transparency3%

“Not see through”

Stretchability/Expandability/Elasticity3%

“The fabric is stretchy and soft”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall13%

“Run large”

Color8%

“color not accurate”

Transparency6%

“Definitely see through”

Material Quality5%

“Horrible material”

Waist Fit4%

“Too tight banding at waist”

Thickness3%

“They are thick”

Smell3%

“smell bad”

Quality-Overall3%

“Cheap”

Thin2%

“Thin material”

Comfort-Overall2%

“not super comfortable”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall32%
Waist Fit18%
Material Quality9%
Length6%
Thin5%
Color4%
Inseam Fit3%
Transparency3%
Thigh Fit3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%