Skip to content
39

pomada nmd

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.2%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 31Growth 20Conversion 3Competition 96Returns 13Price range 51Avg price 78Brand share 15Review moat 41Quality gap 58

Competition

Incredible17%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Great$91.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$10.52–$178.06

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,400.95

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Okay$141K

$141K/yr · 646K searches

Growth

Bad-10.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Returns

Bad8.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (17% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

68

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

5%

  • adidas65%
  • adidas Originals17%
  • NOBULL8%
  • Feethit4%
  • Chopben1%
  • LEZTA1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (11 brands, 5%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$3K4%$6K6%$8K8%$11K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)3 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 130 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 27 weeks — -10.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KSpike '26Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall35%

“Extremely comfortable”

Size-Overall10%

“true to fit”

Value For Money7%

“Good price”

Quality-Overall6%

“Good quality”

Durability4%

“good durability”

Shape/Style3%

“Nice fashion”

Weight Light3%

“The shoes are lightweight”

Design-Overall2%

“- The look is stylish”

Exercise/Sports Suitability2%

“Good for walking”

Color2%

“Color is great”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall22%

“Not a good fit”

Quality-Overall12%

“Cheaply made”

Durability7%

“broke off after a month of wearing them”

Comfort-Overall7%

“Not comfortable”

Pain Relief-Overall5%

“it felt like a sharp pain”

Feet Fit4%

“For some reason one shoe feels so tight like if it was a different size”

Strap/String Quality3%

“the string that holds the laces broke in exact same way as the first pair”

Value For Money3%

“not a safe idea to pay $70+ for these the are cheap”

Arch Support2%

“Would not recommend if you are needing good arch support”

Design-Overall2%

“Horrible design”

Top return reasons

Feet Fit28%
Size-Overall26%
Width12%
Length11%
Comfort-Overall3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Color2%
Shape/Style2%
Material Quality1%
Product Condition1%