Skip to content
51

police badge

Worth a look

Shows no brand lock-in (top 5 brands take 47% of clicks), but soft demand (-13.2% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 34Growth 18Conversion 33Competition 78Returns 38Price range 76Avg price 74Brand share 88Review moat 79Quality gap 43

Brand share

Great47%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Review moat

Great412.33

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$5.73–$45.24

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$14.92

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Okay4.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Okay$161K

$161K/yr · 404K searches

Conversion

Okay2.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-13.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

32 falling

Sellers

48

Top-5 brand share

47%

Open market

47%

  • Hmxpls14%
  • Generic11%
  • Spooktacular Creations8%
  • ForFine7%
  • Kangaroo6%
  • KANGHEMAOYI6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$5K6%$10K9%$15K12%$19K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 45 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
45K35KSpike '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall29%

“Honestly way higher quality than I expected”

Value For Money15%

“Cheap Price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“They are as advertised”

Material Quality8%

“not cheap plastic”

Durability7%

“Holds up to wear and tear”

Gifting Purpose6%

“Great gag gift”

Size-Overall5%

“The size is just right”

Fun/Entertainment Experience4%

“super fun”

Strength3%

“Very sturdy”

Ease Of Use2%

“We used it on stage for a play and it was easy to use and looked authentic”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall26%

“They are to short”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“The item shown is no longer what you will receive”

Thickness9%

“the only thing i could say bad is I wish the pin was a little thicker”

Quality-Overall9%

“are not well made”

Value For Money8%

“somehow it was cheaper to buy 4 than it was to buy 1”

Durability7%

“Durability is a little iffy”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“The stickers have poor adhesive”

Strength4%

“will break easily”

Material Quality3%

“Very cheaply made”

Color3%

“I did not realize the color would be closer to gold than copper or bronze”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall32%
Quality-Overall18%
Value For Money9%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Material Quality4%
Color3%
Functionality-Overall2%
Weight Heavy2%
Durability1%