Skip to content
54

oakley replacement lenses

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($58.40 avg), but weak search conversion (1.4%) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 64Conversion 18Competition 78Returns 35Price range 45Avg price 90Brand share 40Review moat 68Quality gap 58

Avg price

Great$58.40

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great37%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Good789.25

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+42.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good$282K

$282K/yr · 338K searches

Price range

Okay$8.89–$197.90

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Okay81%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Returns

Okay4.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad1.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (37% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

23

Top-5 brand share

81%

Open market

14%

  • Oakley54%
  • Revant11%
  • Predrox6%
  • XVXVTTXV5%
  • Tintart5%
  • IKON LENSES5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (8 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$8K6%$17K9%$25K12%$34K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 44 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +42.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
10K6KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall42%

“Exact fit”

Value For Money17%

“Good price”

Quality-Overall13%

“Quality and easy to install”

Color9%

“colors are brighter”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy replacement”

Scratch Resistance2%

“No scratching”

Durability1%

“Clear, durable, and easy to install”

Strength0%

“SOLID”

Exercise/Sports Suitability0%

“Perfect for baseball and running”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall55%

“Did not fit”

Quality-Overall9%

“These are definitely NOT as good as those”

Scratch Resistance5%

“Absolutely Not Scratch Resistant”

Durability5%

“Doesnt last long”

Color4%

“Tint is a little dark”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Very false advertising”

Thickness2%

“they are a little thinner than the original”

Strength1%

“feel a bit flimsy”

Ease Of Use1%

“A bit tricky to get in”

Value For Money0%

“Kind of pricey”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall63%
Advertised Vs Actual Product15%
Color7%
Shape/Style3%
Length2%
Width2%
Scratch Resistance2%
Value For Money1%
Product Condition1%
Defective Material/Parts1%