Skip to content
55

oakley crankshaft replacement lenses

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($45.78 avg), but a small market ($89K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 22Growth 66Conversion 46Competition 76Returns 44Price range 67Avg price 95Brand share 42Review moat 62Quality gap 62

Avg price

Incredible$45.78

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$8.27–$136.06

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+45.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good1,029.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Okay3.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Okay3.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Okay80%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Bad$89K

$89K/yr · 53K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

26

Top-5 brand share

80%

Open market

15%

  • Oakley37%
  • Combine818%
  • Revant10%
  • ToughAsNails9%
  • GALAXYLENSE6%
  • Mryok5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (9 brands, 15%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$3K6%$5K9%$8K12%$11K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 45 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +45.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money26%

“Worth the money”

Size-Overall22%

“Fit perfect”

Quality-Overall22%

“Excellent quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Just what I needed”

Strength5%

“Solid sunglasses that arent flimsy”

Comfort-Overall3%

“they are comfortable”

Shape/Style2%

“Good style”

Product Condition2%

“Greet like new again”

Gifting Purpose2%

“Perfect gift for the guy in your life”

Color1%

“Great pair of shades”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall20%

“WAY TOOOO SMALL”

Durability19%

“Broke again”

Quality-Overall12%

“just a horrible bag”

Strength8%

“Flimsy plastic”

Value For Money7%

“Overpriced”

Color6%

“Blue & red lens have hue”

Comfort-Overall5%

“Uncomfortable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“NOT SAME AS DESCRIBED”

Allergies3%

“All plastic no good for my nose have red spot on my skin”

Thickness2%

“is very thin”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall65%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Shape/Style5%
Length3%
Comfort-Overall2%
Value For Money2%
Quality-Overall2%
Width2%
Color2%
Defective Material/Parts1%