Skip to content
40

nike vomero plus

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.0%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 9Growth 75Conversion 1Competition 85Returns 5Price range 23Avg price 60Brand share 15Review moat 78Quality gap 42

Competition

Great30%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Review moat

Great445.66

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Good+59.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Good$144.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Bad$46.93–$278.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Market size

Bad$38K

$38K/yr · 655K searches

Returns

Bad10.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Bad0.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (30% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

12 rising

Sellers

201

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

5%

  • Nike63%
  • ANTA20%
  • ASICS6%
  • Brooks3%
  • Mizuno2%
  • NORTIV 82%
  • Open — no brand owns it (6 brands, 5%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$1K6%$2K9%$3K12%$5K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)4 products missing review or click data not plotted

All 76 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 11 weeks — +59.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KSpike '26Apr '26May '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall36%

“these actually stay comfortable the whole time”

Size-Overall8%

“Fit to size for me”

Value For Money7%

“Worth every penny”

Exercise/Sports Suitability6%

“Excellent for running”

Quality-Overall6%

“Excellent product”

Cushion3%

“super comfortable and lots of cushioning, especially for somebody with flat feet”

Weight Light3%

“Light on the feet”

Durability3%

“Durable/ comfortable”

Heel Support3%

“Size right on, heel that won't crush down, and comfy sole”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Better than advertised”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall17%

“they run short”

Comfort-Overall10%

“Uncomfortable”

Pain Relief-Overall9%

“hurts my toes”

Durability5%

“broke them in for about a month before”

Cushion4%

“Oddly there is little cushioning in the front”

Quality-Overall4%

“Bad quality”

Color4%

“Unfortunately I only like the white ones”

Exercise/Sports Suitability3%

“I probably wouldnt recommend for running or jogging”

Feet Fit3%

“HUGE tennis shoes”

Arch Support2%

“I did not see/feel any arch support”

Top return reasons

Feet Fit27%
Size-Overall23%
Length13%
Width9%
Comfort-Overall6%
Color5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Cushion2%
Arch Support2%
Product Condition1%